Saturday, January 28, 2012
US steps outside the law as the war on terror drones on
Justin Randle
January 24, 2012
Opinion
'Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles, are the new face of the war on terror.' Photo: Reuters
The CIA recently launched its first drone attack of 2012. Three people in North Waziristan were killed. If you haven't yet heard of these Terminator-style US drones, it is likely you will soon. Their usage in surveillance, modern warfare and covert ''counter-terrorism'' measures is rapidly expanding.
Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles, are the new face of the war on terror and the latest attempt by the United States to circumvent international law in pursuit of its alleged enemies. After failing to fulfil his promise to close the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, President Barack Obama spent New Year's Eve signing the National Defense Authorisation Act (NDAA). The NDAA codifies the indefinite detention, without trial, of US citizens. The third part of this trinity is the increase in a multi-agency network of drones carrying out secret extrajudicial assassinations of suspected militants. In his inauguration speech, Obama said: ''As for our common defence, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.'' Yet these policies enshrine just such a false dichotomy.
Equipped with Hellfire missiles, Predator drones operate mainly in north-west Pakistan. New America Foundation has attempted to map the strikes, which have hugely escalated under Obama's presidency. Between 2004 and 2011, the foundation conservatively estimates 1717 deaths have resulted from drone strikes in Pakistan. It also estimates a 32 per cent civilian death rate.
New York Times reporter David Rohde, who was kidnapped and held in Pakistan for seven months, referred to the drones as a ''terrifying presence''. Pashtun tribal elders have also spoken of the ongoing drone presence and living with the constant fear of death.
At a meeting held in Waziristan, organised by the UK legal charity Reprieve, locals were encouraged to accumulate photographic evidence of the damage these strikes cause. Tariq Aziz, a 16-year-old boy, offered to collect this information if it would help protect his family. Within 72 hours the car he was travelling in was blown up by a drone.
American officials have reportedly praised the precision of the drone attacks. According to The Guardian, ''the CIA does not comment on drones, but privately claims civilian casualties are rare''. Was Tariq Aziz a militant? Was his 12-year-old cousin - also killed - a militant? Was he involved in plotting attacks that may have jeopardised American lives? Here is the problem: amid official secrecy and in the absence of an allegation tried, tested and proven or disproven in an independent and transparent court, we can only guess. If Guantanamo and the NDAA represent an assault on the right to due process, drones dispense with the principle entirely.
The situation in Waziristan is further compounded by the absence of journalists who can refute claims that innocent people are killed or independently investigate them.
The targets of drones are not only ''unpeople'' - people whose rights and lives are deemed expendable in the pursuit of foreign policy objectives. In September 2011, US citizen and radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was extrajudicially assassinated in a US drone strike in Yemen. Two weeks later, his 16-year-old son was also killed in a drone strike. That the US government is practising a policy of death penalty without trial for US citizens should be alarming for both progressives and conservatives.
Howard Koh, the State Department's top legal adviser, has stated drone strikes ''comply with all applicable law, including the laws of war''. But one can argue anything is legal if a ''self-defence'' or ''for security reasons'' is placed in front of it. That doesn't necessarily make it just, right or wise.
Drone strikes rely on fallible intelligence from local informants, which leads to errors. The price is innocent people's lives. It also sets a dangerous international precedent - that the secret extrajudicial execution by one country, to kill people in another country, with minimal oversight and no judicial process, is acceptable. This is the policy being carried out by drones.
At a very basic level, it is difficult to gauge whether the policy actually works. Supporters claim the policy has successfully disrupted terrorist networks. Yet suicide attacks in Pakistan and violence in Afghanistan and Iraq have often intensified following the drone deaths of senior al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives.
According to various sources, Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud has been killed multiple times, exposing both the imprecise nature of the policy and the prevalence of misinformation.
Drone strikes also fuel anti-American sentiment. Waziristan native Noor Behram has stated that typically after a drone strike the view is: ''America is killing us inside our own country, inside our own homes, and only because we are Muslims … hatred builds up.'' As such, it is no surprise that the former director of US National Intelligence, Dennis Blair, has criticised the policy, saying: ''Drone strikes are no longer the most effective strategy for eliminating al-Qaeda's ability to attack us.''
But any debate regarding merits, costs and legitimacy is obscured by the secrecy within which it is conducted. In the absence of information, the people in whose names these actions are committed are denied the opportunity to make an informed judgment. But perhaps that is the point.
Justin Randle is a former ministerial adviser working in public policy.
Follow the National Times on Twitter: @NationalTimesAUWednesday, January 25, 2012
Drowning In Hypocrisy
Paul Craig Roberts
Institute for Political Economy
paulcraigroberts.orgIf it requires 11 aircraft carriers to deal with Iran, how many will Panetta need to project power against Russia and China? But to get on with the main point, Iran has been trying “to deal with us through diplomacy.” The response from Washington has been belligerent threats of military attack, unfounded and irresponsible accusations that Iran is making a nuclear weapon, sanctions and an oil embargo. Washington’s accusations echo Israel’s and are contradicted by Washington’s own intelligence agencies and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Why doesn’t Washington respond to Iran in a civilized manner with diplomacy? Really, which of the two countries is the greatest threat to peace?
Read more
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Sunday, January 22, 2012
News Media Collaborated in 9-11 False Flag
A new book shows how humanity is under constant covert attack
from Cabalistic (Masonic) Jewish bankers, using the news media to
falsify reality. Thus they contrive wars to degrade, disinherit and
ultimately destroy us. If we heed their siren calls, we are complicit
in our own destruction.
“We have already contrived to possess the minds of the goy communities…[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses.” – Protocols of Zion, 12
Edward Hendrie is a lawyer. His book, “9-11 – Enemies Foreign and Domestic” builds a powerful case that 9-11 was an egregious fraud and act of treason perpetrated against the American people. Clearly, a large segment of the US political, military and media class is complicit in the mass murder and/or cover-up, from the President on down.
Hendrie dissects and discredits the official story placing the blame on the Israeli Mossad. He presents the attack in the context of numerous other Zionist false flags against the US (Beirut Marine barracks, USS Liberty) designed to change US policy. Hendrie effectively explains the broad religious context, i.e. the Cabalist and Talmudic Jewish vendetta against mankind. I haven’t read anything for a while that so vividly exposes the control Illuminati bankers have over our lives.
Their ownership of the mass media is a large part of this control. Hendrie shows how the media was an active collaborator in the 9-11 fraud. As I suspected, no planes hit the Twin Towers or the Pentagon. The plane images were computer generated and synchronized with explosions in the buildings.
Hendrie shows that many of the “eye witness” accounts were employees of the TV networks and that many real eye witness reports of explosions but no planes were ignored.
Furthermore, the BBC reported the collapse of WTC-7, a 47-floor building, 20 minutes before it occurred. AP and CNN prepared obituary pictures for the 9-11 passengers three days before the attack occurred.
It makes sense to me that since no plane crashed at Shanksville or at the Pentagon, no planes were involved at the WTC either. These people have a consistent MO.
SUPPRESSING THE TRUTH
Hendrie shows that the “news” suppresses the truth and literally creates reality according to the Illuminati script.
The truth is that the Twin Towers were designed to withstand hits by large passenger planes and that supposed fires ignited by jet fuels could not reach temperatures necessary to melt steel girders. Hendrie attributes the fact that the two buildings and their contents became dust to a “direct energy weapon” related to HAARP. This weapon reduced almost everything to their molecular level. Cars and file cabinets melted but trees and paper were unaffected, let alone burned.
Hendrie reveals that Category Three hurricane “Erin”, packing 120 mph winds was about 200 miles from NYC at the time of the attack. He cites physicist Dr. Judy Wood who theorizes that the hurricane “acted as a massive Tesla coil creating field effects used by directed energy weapons on 9-11.”
The purpose of 9-11 was to create a Zionist police state and to justify wars against Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran. Hendrie believes the Iraq war was prompted by Sadaam Hussein’s decision to stop trading oil in dollars. Apparently, the bankers need petrodollars to support the burgeoning US debt and keep the $US from collapsing.
Hendrie speculates that the passengers of UA-93 were unloaded in Cleveland and murdered at a NASA facility at the airport. The damage at the Pentagon, which killed 125 people, was caused by explosions. The attack targeted offices where accountants were investigating the disappearance of $1.2 trillion.
Osama bin Laden died in late 2001 of Marfan syndrome. The recent “assassination” by Navy Seals was designed to rescue Obama, who was embattled by “birther” and other issues.
CONCLUSION
This 300-page book is carefully documented and throws our common dilemma into stark relief. We live in a theater of the absurd where psychopaths and their enablers have taken control.
Hendrie makes clear that Cabalist Jewish bankers are at the heart of the conspiracy and Zionism is its most powerful instrument. He makes a convincing case that Mossad organized and executed the 9-11 attack. Senior members of the Bush administration were active collaborators. He cites admissions from insiders that this was an “inside job.”
Apart from Zionists, the Illuminati bankers depend on the collaboration of millions of Freemasons and other non-Jews willing to sell their soul to the devil, and betray their country for personal gain.
Our situation is analogous the movie “The Invasion of the Body Snatchers” where an alien force has invaded the peoples’ minds and souls. The nations of the world have been profoundly subverted by evil.
The 9-11 official story demonstrates how the Cabalists think they can turn their lies into reality. But the truth remains the truth.
Truthers are making the Illuminati hesitate before pulling off their next false flag. They know they will not be believed. In that sense, people like Edward Hendrie are taking that strategy away and saving us from disaster.
Source.
“We have already contrived to possess the minds of the goy communities…[they are] looking through the spectacles we are setting astride their noses.” – Protocols of Zion, 12
Edward Hendrie is a lawyer. His book, “9-11 – Enemies Foreign and Domestic” builds a powerful case that 9-11 was an egregious fraud and act of treason perpetrated against the American people. Clearly, a large segment of the US political, military and media class is complicit in the mass murder and/or cover-up, from the President on down.
Hendrie dissects and discredits the official story placing the blame on the Israeli Mossad. He presents the attack in the context of numerous other Zionist false flags against the US (Beirut Marine barracks, USS Liberty) designed to change US policy. Hendrie effectively explains the broad religious context, i.e. the Cabalist and Talmudic Jewish vendetta against mankind. I haven’t read anything for a while that so vividly exposes the control Illuminati bankers have over our lives.
Their ownership of the mass media is a large part of this control. Hendrie shows how the media was an active collaborator in the 9-11 fraud. As I suspected, no planes hit the Twin Towers or the Pentagon. The plane images were computer generated and synchronized with explosions in the buildings.
Hendrie shows that many of the “eye witness” accounts were employees of the TV networks and that many real eye witness reports of explosions but no planes were ignored.
Furthermore, the BBC reported the collapse of WTC-7, a 47-floor building, 20 minutes before it occurred. AP and CNN prepared obituary pictures for the 9-11 passengers three days before the attack occurred.
It makes sense to me that since no plane crashed at Shanksville or at the Pentagon, no planes were involved at the WTC either. These people have a consistent MO.
SUPPRESSING THE TRUTH
Hendrie shows that the “news” suppresses the truth and literally creates reality according to the Illuminati script.
The truth is that the Twin Towers were designed to withstand hits by large passenger planes and that supposed fires ignited by jet fuels could not reach temperatures necessary to melt steel girders. Hendrie attributes the fact that the two buildings and their contents became dust to a “direct energy weapon” related to HAARP. This weapon reduced almost everything to their molecular level. Cars and file cabinets melted but trees and paper were unaffected, let alone burned.
Hendrie reveals that Category Three hurricane “Erin”, packing 120 mph winds was about 200 miles from NYC at the time of the attack. He cites physicist Dr. Judy Wood who theorizes that the hurricane “acted as a massive Tesla coil creating field effects used by directed energy weapons on 9-11.”
The purpose of 9-11 was to create a Zionist police state and to justify wars against Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran. Hendrie believes the Iraq war was prompted by Sadaam Hussein’s decision to stop trading oil in dollars. Apparently, the bankers need petrodollars to support the burgeoning US debt and keep the $US from collapsing.
Hendrie speculates that the passengers of UA-93 were unloaded in Cleveland and murdered at a NASA facility at the airport. The damage at the Pentagon, which killed 125 people, was caused by explosions. The attack targeted offices where accountants were investigating the disappearance of $1.2 trillion.
Osama bin Laden died in late 2001 of Marfan syndrome. The recent “assassination” by Navy Seals was designed to rescue Obama, who was embattled by “birther” and other issues.
CONCLUSION
This 300-page book is carefully documented and throws our common dilemma into stark relief. We live in a theater of the absurd where psychopaths and their enablers have taken control.
Hendrie makes clear that Cabalist Jewish bankers are at the heart of the conspiracy and Zionism is its most powerful instrument. He makes a convincing case that Mossad organized and executed the 9-11 attack. Senior members of the Bush administration were active collaborators. He cites admissions from insiders that this was an “inside job.”
Apart from Zionists, the Illuminati bankers depend on the collaboration of millions of Freemasons and other non-Jews willing to sell their soul to the devil, and betray their country for personal gain.
Our situation is analogous the movie “The Invasion of the Body Snatchers” where an alien force has invaded the peoples’ minds and souls. The nations of the world have been profoundly subverted by evil.
The 9-11 official story demonstrates how the Cabalists think they can turn their lies into reality. But the truth remains the truth.
Truthers are making the Illuminati hesitate before pulling off their next false flag. They know they will not be believed. In that sense, people like Edward Hendrie are taking that strategy away and saving us from disaster.
Source.
Friday, January 20, 2012
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Doctor Doom Warns: “World War III Will Occur In the Next Five Years”
Mac Slavo
Infowars.com
January 17, 2012
As is generally the case, Dr. Faber doesn’t mince words and warns that, despite what happens in the near term, the end game is global conflict.
Excerpted from Barron’s 2012 Roundtable via SGT ReportDr. Faber has also expressed his views on prior occasions, suggesting that World War III is an inevitable outcome when nations begin to default on trillions of dollars worth of debt (whether by refusing to pay or simply easing their monetary supply).
Marc Faber: On another optimistic note, World War III will occur in the next five years. That means the Middle East will blow up. New regimes there will be less Western-friendly. The West has also figured out it can’t contain China, which is rising rapidly and will have more military and naval power in Southeast Asia. The only way for the West to contain China is to control the oil tap in the Middle East.
Bill Gross (Founder, Pimco): How does your World War III hypothesis affect the financial markets? Is it positive for stocks?
Marc Faber: It is very positive for stocks and negative for bonds, because debt will grow dramatically. There will be massive monetization of debt. When the U.S. entered World War II total credit equaled 140% of GDP, and there were no unfunded liabilities. Now total credit-market debt is 380% of GDP, and unfunded liabilities make that 800%.
Brian Rogers (Chairman, T. Rowe Price): How is World War III good for stocks?
Felix Zulauf (Zulauf Asset Management): Unused capacity in an economy can be directed to the defense and war industry. That will be paid for by new government debt, and that keeps the economy growing.
Scott Black (President, Delphi): Marc, if Israel strikes Iran’s nuclear facilities, they will use air power. They aren’t going to commit ground troops. It won’t be the kind of conflagration you’re thinking.
Bill Gross: War takes place today in cyberspace and in terrorist space. Whether or not there will be a land war isn’t the question.
In August of 2010 Faber urged his subscribers to begin making preparations for worst case scenarios:
In his latest GBD Report, Faber again advises those with the means to do it, to leave urban areas and seek safety in rural, country areas, preferably farms, and to be prepared to defend that land in the event the worst happens:While several members of the Roundtable disagree with the idea that a conventional global war is out of the question, suggesting instead that conflicts will be dealt with through air superiority and in cyberspace (in itself a potentially catastrophic battlefield for modern civilization), they are ignoring the real possibility that an attack on Iran, or even a rogue attack against Europe or the United States, could escalate to such a level that China or Russia would have no choice but to get involved.
Faber has an interesting suggestion for investors if the plunge comes to pass.
With tongue apparently in cheek, he says buy a farm you can tend to yourself way out in the boondocks. And protect it with high voltage fences, barbed wire, booby traps, military weapons and Dobermans.
While hard to believe, we’ve seen it before. Twice just in the last century.
Not many people would have believed it prior to 1914 either. But within just a few short months of the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in late June of that year, millions were dead and the Western front had extended hundreds of miles across Europe to the North Sea.
Events played out with similar velocity in World War II when Adolf Hitler’s aptly named Blitzkrieg (Lightning War) overtook entire nations in a matter of days.
It only takes one country, one sociopathic leader with his finger on the button, to get the ball rolling. Then there is no stopping it.
Mac Slavo is the editor and writer at SHTFPlan.com
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Monday, January 9, 2012
Sunday, January 8, 2012
The Codex, Fluoride, Auschwitz, Monsanto Connection
By Barbara H. Peterson
Farm Wars
What do Codex Alimentarius with its official food standards, the fluoridation of our water and food supply, genocide at the Auschwitz concentration camp, and Monsanto, the company responsible for genetically altering the world’s food supply all have in common? Is there a connection that binds these seemingly diverse organizations together? Yes, there is. In fact, they are so inextricably bound that separating them is all but impossible.
Let’s start at the beginning with Auschwitz and connect the dots.
Auschwitz
Auschwitz was known for its “network of concentration and extermination camps built and operated in Polish areas annexed by Nazi Germany during the Second World War. It was the largest of the German concentration camps (Wikipedia).”
Auschwitz also had a factory called I. G. Auschwitz:
I.G.
Auschwitz, founded in Kattowitz on April 7, 1941, was intended to be
the largest chemical factory in Eastern Europe and at the same time a
building block in the process of “Germanizing” the region. According to
the plan, the production facilities were to supply the Eastern European
market with plastics in peacetime, following their use for wartime
production. In addition to German skilled workers and forced laborers
from all over Europe, increasing numbers of prisoners from the
Auschwitz concentration camp were deployed at the gigantic construction
site in Auschwitz. In 1942 I.G. Auschwitz built its own corporate
concentration camp, Buna/Monowitz. (Wollheim Memorial)
In fact, I.G. Auschwitz was designed from the very first to be an extremely complex chemical factory, producing, besides Buna, high-performance fuels (including aviation gasoline and fuel oil for naval use), various plastics, synthetic fibers, stabilizing agents, resins, methanol, nitrogen, and pharmaceuticals. (Wollheim Memorial)
I.G. Farben, which consisted of BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst (now known as Aventis), owned I.G. Auschwitz. A man called Frits ter Meer was on the I.G. Farben Managing Board from its foundation, and was responsible for I.G. Auschwitz. I. G. Auschwitz had a cozy relationship with the Auschwitz concentration camp, in that it used forced labor of the prisoners to work in its factory, and also used them as guinea pigs.
Under Frits ter Meers direction, I.G. Farben used a fluoridation program to control the population at the Auschwitz concentration camp in any given area through the mass medication of drinking water supplies.“By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication (fluoride) that would produce sterility in women, and so on.” (ShopUSI)
Frits ter Meer was ultimately convicted at Nuremberg of plundering and slavery, but his sentence was commuted due to friends in high places. Fritz then went on to become one of the architects of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 1962/3.
Codex Alimentarius
Codex was created by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) of the United Nations (UN). According to the Codex official site:
The Codex Alimentarius Commission was created in 1963 by FAO and WHO to develop food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. The main purposes of this Programme are protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations.(Codex Alimentarius)
The Codex Alimentarius Commission implements the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program, the purpose of which is to protect the health of consumers and to ensure fair practices in the food trade.(Organic Consumers)
In other words, under the auspices of “protecting the public health and ensuring fair trade practices,” the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program is implemented by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The FAO and WHO set the standards, and the Codex Commission implements them. All members of the UN are obligated to comply with these standards.
So, what does Codex have to do with fluoridation, and just how could a mass fluoridation program be implemented without our knowledge or consent under Codex guidelines?
The answer is – WHO has already determined that fluoride should be included in our food and water supply because it is “necessary for public health:”
Many countries that are currently undergoing nutrition transition do not have adequate exposure to fluoride. There should be promotion of adequate fluoride exposure via appropriate vehicles, for example, affordable toothpaste, water, salt and milk. It is the responsibility of national health authorities to ensure implementation of feasible fluoride programmes for their country. Research into the outcome of alternative community fluoride programmes should be encouraged.
Here is the reference document:
Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases PDF
A 1994 World Health Organization expert committee suggested a level of fluoride from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/L (milligrams per litre) (Wikipedia)
Currently, compliance with WHO’s directive of the fluoridation of water, salt, and milk varies from country to country. Water fluoridation has been introduced by varying degrees in many countries. View each country HERE. An interesting fact to note is that drinking water is not fluoridated in any part of Germany. Is it mere coincidence that one of the founders of the Codex Alimentarius Commission just happened to be in charge of the fluoridation program at Auschwitz, and that Germany is somehow exempt from fluoridation? Or, maybe they know something that we don’t.
The Public Fluoridation Deception
Most are aware of the water fluoridation program that has been foisted upon us as a “treatment for dental disease” and cure for cavities. This is proven propaganda and has been disputed in the EPA’s own documents, which list fluoride as a contaminant, as well as in countless other professional publications. Yet, the mass water fluoridation program continues, causing food and liquids that use this contaminated water to contain fluoride also. According to our own CDC Department of Health and Human Services:
“fluoridated water is diffused throughout the population as residents of non-fluoridated communities increasingly consume foods and beverages processed and bottled in fluoridated communities. Thus, many individuals residing in non-fluoridated communities have benefited from fluoridation policies.”
This is called “Building Capacity to Fluoridate.” (CDC)
So you see, our country is complying with the UN/WHO/FAO/Codex fluoridation policy and we the people don’t even know it. Just like the prisoners at Auschwitz most likely didn’t know that they were being subjected to a fluoridation program and being poisoned with their water until it was too late. If food is produced using fluoridated water, then it contains fluoride. All you have to do is contaminate the water, and the food issue takes care of itself.
The following chart shows just how “in compliance” the U.S. is: Percent of U.S. Population Receiving Fluoride
And if some of you are still wondering if we are really following Codex mandates, wonder no more. Many do not know this, but ‘Codex’ already consists of around 300 official food standards, some of which have been in ‘global effect’ since as long ago as 1966 (Rath Foundation). So it shouldn’t come as a big surprise to find out that fluoridation is just another facet of this program.
The Monsanto Connection
Monsanto,
Cargill, BASF, Bayer, and Aventis (or I.G. Farben) are all in
partnership under the banner of Crop Science. They are partnered in
various ways, such as:
BASF Plant Science and Monsanto to expand their collaboration in maximizing crop yield.
Monsanto, Bayer team up on herbicide tolerance
Mergers and acquisitions
Monsanto and Cargill team up
Monsanto and Cargill are in a 50/50 joint venture partnership. Monsanto makes the seeds, which make the crops, and Cargill makes the fertilizer. Cargill also just happens to be responsible for 70-75% of the hazardous waste hydrofluosilicic acid used in fluoridation programs. (Fluoride Action Network)
The U.S. government considers the basic chemical composition of hydrofluosilicic acid, a toxic waste, and fluoride to be the same when dumped in the water supply:
Due to the obviously intriguing aspect of this “waste disposal policy”, there has naturally been quite a bit of curiosity concerning the safety of this public health practice. Apparently, however, there are no government safety studies currently available on fluosilicic acid. This is because the government is basing their fluoridation policy on the assumption that there is no chemical difference, after dilution into the water supply, between pharmaceutical grade sodium fluoride and the industrial grade hydrofluosilicic acid.(Fluoride Action Network)
Oregon, which is very low on the compliance list with only 19.4% fluoridation, is attempting to increase that level considerably. In 2007, HB 3099, the Oregon water fluoridation bill, would have required community water suppliers serving more than 10,000 people to “optimally fluoridate.” Fortunately, it was not passed. If passed, it would have increased the fluoride levels in Oregon to 68%. Good for Cargill and Monsanto, bad for us.
Reasons Not to Fluoridate
The following partial list is compiled from Fluoride Alert:
Fluoride is a cumulative poison.
Chromosome damage
Kidneys
Brain
Alzheimers
Rats dosed prenatally demonstrated hyperactive behavior. Those dosed postnatally demonstrated hypoactivity (i.e. under activity or “couch potato” syndrome)
Lowering of IQ
Early onset of puberty
Affects thyroid gland
Arthritis
Cancer
Infertility
Harms bones – brittle
It is up to us to stand up and say no to mass water fluoridation. If someone wants fluoride, then let him/her take it. I have no problem with that. But to forcibly administer this poison to an unsuspecting and unwilling populace without prior knowledge or consent is criminal. We are not Auschwitz prisoners….yet.
© 2010 Barbara H. Peterson
Farm Wars
What do Codex Alimentarius with its official food standards, the fluoridation of our water and food supply, genocide at the Auschwitz concentration camp, and Monsanto, the company responsible for genetically altering the world’s food supply all have in common? Is there a connection that binds these seemingly diverse organizations together? Yes, there is. In fact, they are so inextricably bound that separating them is all but impossible.
Let’s start at the beginning with Auschwitz and connect the dots.
Auschwitz
Auschwitz was known for its “network of concentration and extermination camps built and operated in Polish areas annexed by Nazi Germany during the Second World War. It was the largest of the German concentration camps (Wikipedia).”
Auschwitz also had a factory called I. G. Auschwitz:
I.G.
Auschwitz, founded in Kattowitz on April 7, 1941, was intended to be
the largest chemical factory in Eastern Europe and at the same time a
building block in the process of “Germanizing” the region. According to
the plan, the production facilities were to supply the Eastern European
market with plastics in peacetime, following their use for wartime
production. In addition to German skilled workers and forced laborers
from all over Europe, increasing numbers of prisoners from the
Auschwitz concentration camp were deployed at the gigantic construction
site in Auschwitz. In 1942 I.G. Auschwitz built its own corporate
concentration camp, Buna/Monowitz. (Wollheim Memorial)In fact, I.G. Auschwitz was designed from the very first to be an extremely complex chemical factory, producing, besides Buna, high-performance fuels (including aviation gasoline and fuel oil for naval use), various plastics, synthetic fibers, stabilizing agents, resins, methanol, nitrogen, and pharmaceuticals. (Wollheim Memorial)
I.G. Farben, which consisted of BASF, Bayer, and Hoechst (now known as Aventis), owned I.G. Auschwitz. A man called Frits ter Meer was on the I.G. Farben Managing Board from its foundation, and was responsible for I.G. Auschwitz. I. G. Auschwitz had a cozy relationship with the Auschwitz concentration camp, in that it used forced labor of the prisoners to work in its factory, and also used them as guinea pigs.
Under Frits ter Meers direction, I.G. Farben used a fluoridation program to control the population at the Auschwitz concentration camp in any given area through the mass medication of drinking water supplies.“By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication (fluoride) that would produce sterility in women, and so on.” (ShopUSI)
Frits ter Meer was ultimately convicted at Nuremberg of plundering and slavery, but his sentence was commuted due to friends in high places. Fritz then went on to become one of the architects of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 1962/3.
Codex AlimentariusCodex was created by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) of the United Nations (UN). According to the Codex official site:
The Codex Alimentarius Commission was created in 1963 by FAO and WHO to develop food standards, guidelines and related texts such as codes of practice under the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. The main purposes of this Programme are protecting health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations.(Codex Alimentarius)
The Codex Alimentarius Commission implements the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program, the purpose of which is to protect the health of consumers and to ensure fair practices in the food trade.(Organic Consumers)
In other words, under the auspices of “protecting the public health and ensuring fair trade practices,” the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program is implemented by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The FAO and WHO set the standards, and the Codex Commission implements them. All members of the UN are obligated to comply with these standards.
So, what does Codex have to do with fluoridation, and just how could a mass fluoridation program be implemented without our knowledge or consent under Codex guidelines?
The answer is – WHO has already determined that fluoride should be included in our food and water supply because it is “necessary for public health:”
Many countries that are currently undergoing nutrition transition do not have adequate exposure to fluoride. There should be promotion of adequate fluoride exposure via appropriate vehicles, for example, affordable toothpaste, water, salt and milk. It is the responsibility of national health authorities to ensure implementation of feasible fluoride programmes for their country. Research into the outcome of alternative community fluoride programmes should be encouraged.
Here is the reference document:
Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases PDF
A 1994 World Health Organization expert committee suggested a level of fluoride from 0.5 to 1.0 mg/L (milligrams per litre) (Wikipedia)
Currently, compliance with WHO’s directive of the fluoridation of water, salt, and milk varies from country to country. Water fluoridation has been introduced by varying degrees in many countries. View each country HERE. An interesting fact to note is that drinking water is not fluoridated in any part of Germany. Is it mere coincidence that one of the founders of the Codex Alimentarius Commission just happened to be in charge of the fluoridation program at Auschwitz, and that Germany is somehow exempt from fluoridation? Or, maybe they know something that we don’t.
The Public Fluoridation Deception
Most are aware of the water fluoridation program that has been foisted upon us as a “treatment for dental disease” and cure for cavities. This is proven propaganda and has been disputed in the EPA’s own documents, which list fluoride as a contaminant, as well as in countless other professional publications. Yet, the mass water fluoridation program continues, causing food and liquids that use this contaminated water to contain fluoride also. According to our own CDC Department of Health and Human Services:
“fluoridated water is diffused throughout the population as residents of non-fluoridated communities increasingly consume foods and beverages processed and bottled in fluoridated communities. Thus, many individuals residing in non-fluoridated communities have benefited from fluoridation policies.”
This is called “Building Capacity to Fluoridate.” (CDC)
So you see, our country is complying with the UN/WHO/FAO/Codex fluoridation policy and we the people don’t even know it. Just like the prisoners at Auschwitz most likely didn’t know that they were being subjected to a fluoridation program and being poisoned with their water until it was too late. If food is produced using fluoridated water, then it contains fluoride. All you have to do is contaminate the water, and the food issue takes care of itself.
The following chart shows just how “in compliance” the U.S. is: Percent of U.S. Population Receiving Fluoride
And if some of you are still wondering if we are really following Codex mandates, wonder no more. Many do not know this, but ‘Codex’ already consists of around 300 official food standards, some of which have been in ‘global effect’ since as long ago as 1966 (Rath Foundation). So it shouldn’t come as a big surprise to find out that fluoridation is just another facet of this program.
The Monsanto Connection
Monsanto,
Cargill, BASF, Bayer, and Aventis (or I.G. Farben) are all in
partnership under the banner of Crop Science. They are partnered in
various ways, such as:BASF Plant Science and Monsanto to expand their collaboration in maximizing crop yield.
Monsanto, Bayer team up on herbicide tolerance
Mergers and acquisitions
Monsanto and Cargill team up
Monsanto and Cargill are in a 50/50 joint venture partnership. Monsanto makes the seeds, which make the crops, and Cargill makes the fertilizer. Cargill also just happens to be responsible for 70-75% of the hazardous waste hydrofluosilicic acid used in fluoridation programs. (Fluoride Action Network)
The U.S. government considers the basic chemical composition of hydrofluosilicic acid, a toxic waste, and fluoride to be the same when dumped in the water supply:
Due to the obviously intriguing aspect of this “waste disposal policy”, there has naturally been quite a bit of curiosity concerning the safety of this public health practice. Apparently, however, there are no government safety studies currently available on fluosilicic acid. This is because the government is basing their fluoridation policy on the assumption that there is no chemical difference, after dilution into the water supply, between pharmaceutical grade sodium fluoride and the industrial grade hydrofluosilicic acid.(Fluoride Action Network)
Oregon, which is very low on the compliance list with only 19.4% fluoridation, is attempting to increase that level considerably. In 2007, HB 3099, the Oregon water fluoridation bill, would have required community water suppliers serving more than 10,000 people to “optimally fluoridate.” Fortunately, it was not passed. If passed, it would have increased the fluoride levels in Oregon to 68%. Good for Cargill and Monsanto, bad for us.
Reasons Not to Fluoridate
The following partial list is compiled from Fluoride Alert:
Fluoride is a cumulative poison.
Chromosome damage
Kidneys
Brain
Alzheimers
Rats dosed prenatally demonstrated hyperactive behavior. Those dosed postnatally demonstrated hypoactivity (i.e. under activity or “couch potato” syndrome)
Lowering of IQ
Early onset of puberty
Affects thyroid gland
Arthritis
Cancer
Infertility
Harms bones – brittle
It is up to us to stand up and say no to mass water fluoridation. If someone wants fluoride, then let him/her take it. I have no problem with that. But to forcibly administer this poison to an unsuspecting and unwilling populace without prior knowledge or consent is criminal. We are not Auschwitz prisoners….yet.
© 2010 Barbara H. Peterson
Friday, January 6, 2012
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Russia Warns Ron Paul Victory Would Lead To American Civil War
An apocalyptic report from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Prime Minister Putin circulating in the Kremlin today warns that the ascendency of US Presidential candidate Ron Paul among the American electorate could very well “sow the seeds” of a civil war in that country; a “virtual certainty,” it says, if he wins his Republican Party nomination to challenge Obama.
According to this report, the “dynamic confluences” of communistic socialism and nationalistic fascism have split the American electorate in half as has not happened since the early 1920’s when the German Empire faced these same forces leading to the rise of Nazism.
The parallels between the present day United States and 1920’s Germany, this report notes, are “too substantial” to be ignored and include: 1.) Staggering war debt; 2.) Unprecedented budget deficits; 3.) Soaring rates of unemployment at, or nearing, depression levels; 4.) Growing protests violently suppressed by police forces; 5.) The virtual elimination of the middle classes as tens of millions fall into poverty and homelessness; 6.) Draconian new laws passed to eliminate all freedoms; 7.) The rapid building of new prisons and concentration camps; 8.) Massively growing police forces and internal checkpoints; 9.) The creation of an elite upper class to which nearly all money flows; and 10.) The takeover by the elite upper classes of the political process and all politicians and political parties.
Most critical to note about Ron Paul, this report says, are the “too many comparisons to be ignored” between him and the “savior” of a defeated German Empire that brought his nation back from the brink of destruction, Adolph Hitler, most notably among the youngest members of their respective societies.
Central to both Ron Paul and Hitler’s campaigns for the leadership of their countries was their calling for the abolition of their Central Banking Systems both of them blamed for the destruction of their nations way of life.
Important to note about Central Banking Systems (like the Federal Reserve System in the US, and European National Bank in the EU) are that once they are established they become the main power behind all ways of life usurping all political power and the rights of people to determine their own fate. This is a harsh reality being ruthlessly learned by many European nations today including, Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Portugal and Hungry whose lives are now dominated and controlled by bankers.
Upon Hitler’s rise to power one of his first acts was to destroy the Central Banking System and set Germany upon its own path of fiscal independence apart from the Global Economic System after which their economy “rose like a rocket and in just one year almost all the people in Germany got a well paid job.”
The most grateful Germans for Hitler’s actions in abolishing the Central Banking System and restoring their economy were the youngest members of their society who formed a group known as “The Hitler Youth” and whose membership rose from 6,000 in 1926 to over 7.3 million by 1939.
Today in America, this report warns, the rise of a new “Hitler Youth” proletariat is coalescing around Ron Paul as evidenced by his rising support among both right-wing (Tea Party Movement) and left-wing (Occupy Movement) factions of youths who know their country has been stolen from them by their elite classes.
Like Hitler before him, this report continues, Ron Paul’s advocacy of abolishing the Central Banking System his country is enslaved to is unequivocal, and as he described the Federal Reserve recently: “It’s sort of like a drug. You get some benefits if you keep using it–you know, run up debt, run up inflation, monetize the debt, make a bigger bubble. Just like a drug addiction, the drug addict feels better when he keeps getting drugs. But the high can’t last forever, and like so many cases of drug addicts, if you don’t do something about it, you kill the patient,” Paul said. “And right now the patient is very, very big, and that’s the worldwide economy.”
Also, like Hitler before him, this report notes, racism appears to be a part of Ron Paul’s “overall makeup” as evidenced by past newsletters that were published under his name and include statements such as: “Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities” because “mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white ‘haves.’” [Note: In numerous interviews, Ron Paul has disavowed knowledge of these racist statements.]
Even more disturbing about Ron Paul, this report warns, are his many “veiled” references to Jews, including blaming them for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City.
As history has long shown, this report says, the abolition of any nations Central Banking System to gain independence from the Global Economic System is all too often accompanied by genocide (such as the Holocaust) when an enraged proletariat assumes power and begins its retribution against all of those“blamed” for destroying their country in the first place.
Even worse, this report notes, is the “trail of death” numbering in the tens of millions exacted by the Central Banking System over the past 100 years alone against any nation seeking independence from it, and includes both World War I and World War II.
Important to note in this report is its not saying that Ron Paul is a modern day Hitler, but rather its noting that the influences behind him are an “exact mirror image” of those that arose out of the German Empire in the 1920’s that can’t be ignored by the Motherland because “sooner rather than later” Russia will inevitably come into conflict with a United States seeking to prevent its demise by outright world domination.
As noted in the American author John Loftus’s book America’s Nazi Secret, it should, also, be mentioned that the United States of today, due to the overwhelming influence of the Nazis brought by the tens of thousands into that country after World War II, it is not the same country the Motherland allied itself with during that last global conflict in the 1930’s and 1940’s, but with each passing day begins to resemble Hitler’s Germany more and more.
There is no greater example of this than Obama’s signing this past weekend of new law allowing for the indefinite jailing of anyone opposing this regime without charges or trial in violation of the US Constitution which strictly prohibits such actions and as warned about by the American Civil Liberty Unions Executive Directors Anthony D. Romero who said: “President Obama’s action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law. The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield.”
Should Ron Paul become that “future president” and decide, like Hitler did before him, that the dangers of the Central Banking System outweighs the freedoms and lives of those who support it then all of the laws needed to imprison those opposed to him are already there at his disposal to use….with civil war being the inevitable outcome.
January 2, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
