Showing posts with label Climate change scam to tax and control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate change scam to tax and control. Show all posts
Monday, January 3, 2011
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Cap & Trade’ Declared ‘DOA’
REPUBLICAN SENATE Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) told a group of business leaders in eastern Kentucky on Aug. 23 that cap and trade, the radical environmental program pushed by Democrats, will not be passed in this Congress, meaning the legislation is effectively “dead.”
Local Kentucky news WKYT reported that McConnell made the announcement while speaking to the Pike County Chamber of Commerce on Aug. 23.
“I think cap and trade, which is also known as the national energy tax, is dead in the United States Senate,” said McConnell.
Cap and trade refers to legislation being pushed mainly by Democrats that would limit carbon emissions in the United States. How it would work is that factories would be issued individual standards by federal bureaucrats, which would dictate the amount of gases each one can produce in a year. The corporation would then have to enact programs to monitor its output. Those that move quickly to reduce certain types of gases and come in under their mandated limit would be able to sell or trade the remaining levels of gases with companies that cannot.
Republicans contend that the new regulations would increase costs on companies that would lead to increased joblessness and rising prices as factories pass on the added environmental costs to consumers.
Local Kentucky news WKYT reported that McConnell made the announcement while speaking to the Pike County Chamber of Commerce on Aug. 23.
“I think cap and trade, which is also known as the national energy tax, is dead in the United States Senate,” said McConnell.
Republicans contend that the new regulations would increase costs on companies that would lead to increased joblessness and rising prices as factories pass on the added environmental costs to consumers.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
We Are Change San Francisco confronts David de Rothschild on Climategate, sustainability agenda
Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010 Aaron Dykes
GCN Live.com
August 2, 2010
Members of We Are Change San Francisco caught up with David de Rothschild, heir to the notorious Rothschild family, and asked him some relevant questions.
Heir to a global system of manipulation, lies and enslavement for the average family, David de Rothschild has put his reputation on the line to push for climate change taxation. David de Rothschild shilled for the Copenhagen climate summit and stumped for his ‘earth saving’ plastiki boat that runs on human feces fuel. He has boldly advocated carbon taxes that his family’s carbon exchange firm would benefit directly from. He has even gone so far in the name of arguing for phony global warming as to claim that icecaps melt on Mars because the planet is closer to the Sun than Earth.
Now David de Rothschild is even taking on crowds and talking to ordinary people to redeem support for phony climate change legislation. At one moment in the video, he attempts to explain away the impact of Climategate in his presentation. Rothschild claims he appreciates the ‘skepticism’ of the public over global warming, but calls it a “futile debate,” arguing that other environmental factors still demand our action… and carbon policing laws.
Members of We Are Change San Francisco then had a chance to chat with David after his talk.
One member asked, “What’s more important, the sustainability you’re talking about, or the 99% of the public who will feel the crunch of dramatically reducing their consumption.”
Rothschild answered, “It’s both. They are one in the same. You can’t separate the two. I think what we have to do is move from a product-based society to a service-based society.”
Editor’s Translation: Yes to feeling the crunch. Expect to see an economy with no manufacturing, where the only jobs available are service jobs, and those will be tightly controlled by the green police and (green) tax collectors.
Rothschild was also asked if population reduction would fit ‘conveniently’ into the sustainability agenda. He shrugged, “Well, nature has a way of doing that.” He made no mention, however, of the depopulation agenda that has been an obsession of the global elite, including his clan, for over a century.
Rothschild also commented that “GM is whack,” an “off-the-cuff” slang remark he used to note both his and the public’s opposition to genetically-modified foods. However, while they could be forced on the majority of the population, Rothschild, like other members of the Super Class, have access to their own supply of unadulterated foods and are unlikely to encounter such tainted and potentially dangerous food stocks.
Nevertheless, he did engage the public; that says something. There has been a noted disaster of public confidence following the Climategate scandal. Though ‘investigations’ cleared the particular professors’ names, the real blow from the leaked documents was the distrust it brought out in their previously willing suckers. Rothschild and everyone else are desperate– in as much as they wish to still push climate laws– to win back the masses. That even means ‘joking’ about Internet rumors that his family descend from a line of rather ‘lizard-like’ ancestors. Ha?
We Are Change San Francisco
http://www.meetup.com/wearechangesf/
GCN Live.com
August 2, 2010
Members of We Are Change San Francisco caught up with David de Rothschild, heir to the notorious Rothschild family, and asked him some relevant questions.
Heir to a global system of manipulation, lies and enslavement for the average family, David de Rothschild has put his reputation on the line to push for climate change taxation. David de Rothschild shilled for the Copenhagen climate summit and stumped for his ‘earth saving’ plastiki boat that runs on human feces fuel. He has boldly advocated carbon taxes that his family’s carbon exchange firm would benefit directly from. He has even gone so far in the name of arguing for phony global warming as to claim that icecaps melt on Mars because the planet is closer to the Sun than Earth.
Members of We Are Change San Francisco then had a chance to chat with David after his talk.
One member asked, “What’s more important, the sustainability you’re talking about, or the 99% of the public who will feel the crunch of dramatically reducing their consumption.”
Rothschild answered, “It’s both. They are one in the same. You can’t separate the two. I think what we have to do is move from a product-based society to a service-based society.”
Editor’s Translation: Yes to feeling the crunch. Expect to see an economy with no manufacturing, where the only jobs available are service jobs, and those will be tightly controlled by the green police and (green) tax collectors.
Rothschild was also asked if population reduction would fit ‘conveniently’ into the sustainability agenda. He shrugged, “Well, nature has a way of doing that.” He made no mention, however, of the depopulation agenda that has been an obsession of the global elite, including his clan, for over a century.
Rothschild also commented that “GM is whack,” an “off-the-cuff” slang remark he used to note both his and the public’s opposition to genetically-modified foods. However, while they could be forced on the majority of the population, Rothschild, like other members of the Super Class, have access to their own supply of unadulterated foods and are unlikely to encounter such tainted and potentially dangerous food stocks.
Nevertheless, he did engage the public; that says something. There has been a noted disaster of public confidence following the Climategate scandal. Though ‘investigations’ cleared the particular professors’ names, the real blow from the leaked documents was the distrust it brought out in their previously willing suckers. Rothschild and everyone else are desperate– in as much as they wish to still push climate laws– to win back the masses. That even means ‘joking’ about Internet rumors that his family descend from a line of rather ‘lizard-like’ ancestors. Ha?
We Are Change San Francisco
http://www.meetup.com/wearechangesf/
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Monday, February 15, 2010
Lawmaker: Climate change just ruse to control population
Updated: 02/05/2010 11:26:26 AM MST
State Rep. Mike Noel,
left, says climate change regulation is a bad idea. (Jim Urquhart/The
Salt Lake Tribune)
The House Natural Resources Committee then approved a resolution that expresses the Utah Legislature's belief that "climate alarmists' carbon dioxide-related global warming hypothesis is unable to account for the current downturn in global temperatures."
Read more
Monday, December 21, 2009
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Copenhagen: The eco-Nazis’ attempt at global bureaucratic coup d’etat has failed
Parturient montes: nascetur ridiculus mus
From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in CopenhagenThe mountains shall labor, and what will be born? A stupid little mouse. Thanks to hundreds of thousands of US citizens who contacted their elected representatives to protest about the unelected, communistic world government with near-infinite powers of taxation, regulation and intervention that was proposed in early drafts of the Copenhagen Treaty, there is no Copenhagen Treaty. There is not even a Copenhagen Agreement. There is a “Copenhagen Accord”.
The White House spinmeisters spun, and their official press release proclaimed, with more than usual fatuity, that President Obama had “salvaged” a deal at Copenhagen in bilateral talks with China, India, Brazil, and South Africa, which had established a negotiating bloc.
The plainly-declared common position of these four developing nations had been the one beacon of clarity and common sense at the foggy fortnight of posturing and gibbering in the ghastly Copenhagen conference center.
This is what the Forthright Four asked for:
Point 1. No compulsory limits on carbon emissions.
Point 2. No emissions reductions at all unless the West paid for them.
Point 3. No international monitoring of any emissions reductions not paid for by the West.
Point 4. No use of “global warming” as an excuse to impose protectionist trade restrictions on countries that did not cut their carbon emissions.
After President Obama’s dramatic intervention to save the deal, this is what the Forthright Four got:
Point 1. No compulsory limits on carbon emissions.
Point 2. No emissions reductions at all unless the West paid for them.
Point 3. No international monitoring of any emissions reductions not paid for by the West.
Point 4. No use of “global warming” as an excuse to impose protectionist trade restrictions on countries that did not cut their carbon emissions.
Here, in a nutshell – for fortunately nothing larger is needed – are the main points of the ”Copenhagen Accord”:
Main points: In the Copenhagen Accord, which is operational immediately, the parties“underline that climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time”; emphasize their “strong political will to urgently combat climate change”; recognize “the scientific view that the increase in global temperature should be below 2 C°” and perhaps below 1.5 C°; aspire to “cooperate in achieving the peaking of global and national emissions as soon as possible”; acknowledge that eradicating poverty is the “overriding priority of developing countries”; and accept the need to help vulnerable countries – especially the least developed nations, small-island states, and Africa – to adapt to climate change.
Self-imposed emissions targets: All parties will set for themselves, and comply with, emissions targets for 2020, to be submitted to the secretariat by 31 January 2010. Where developing countries are paid to cut their emissions, their compliance will be monitored. Developed countries will financially support less-developed countries to prevent deforestation. Carbon trading may be used.
New bureaucracies and funding: Under the supervision of a “High-Level Panel”, developed countries will give up to $30 billion for 2010-12, aiming for $100 billion by 2020, in “scaled up, new and additional, predictable and adequate funding” to developing countries via a “Copenhagen Green Fund”. A “Technology Mechanism” will “accelerate technology development and transfer” to developing countries.
And that’s it. Expensive, yes. Unnecessary, yes. But earth-shaking? No.
The disconnect between the gaseous halations of various grandstanding “world leaders” about the supposedly urgent need to “Save The Planet Now” and the puny outcome of the Copenhagen Non-Event is dazzling. And it is welcome.
For all the rhetoric – or the flatulence that passes for rhetoric these days – it has begun to dawn on the “leaders” of those nations that subject them to regular recall and re-election that the people no longer believe the mad scientists are telling them the truth. And the people are right.
What is more, after the failure of the mainstream news media to report what the malevolent and unpleasant scientists involved in the Climategate affair had written to one another about those with whom they disagreed, or about what they had done to invent, fabricate, contrive, fiddle, tweak, alter, massage, conceal, hide or even destroy scientific data for the sake of protecting and peddling the pseudo-science in which environment correspondents had so readily and so ignorantly believed, the people no longer trust the media.
And that is bad news for a governing class that has come to develop a far-too-cosy relationship with the mainstream media. It is also very bad news for the mainstream media themselves, which are now rapidly losing circulation and ad revenue as the people rightly desert them for the Internet, where - notwithstanding various expensive attempts by the over-funded international Left to interfere with Google and Yahoo searches - the truth is still available if you know where to look.
Copenhagen was the last-chance saloon not for the planet, which does not need saving, but for the UN’s world-government wannabes. They blew it, big-time, by believing their own overspun propaganda about planetary peril and thinking they had “world leaders” where they wanted them. They overreached themselves, and have paid the price.
Even though next year is an el Nino year accompanied by fast-recovering solar activity, 2010 may not, after all, set a new global-temperature record to overtop that which was set in 1998, the year of the Great el Nino. By the time the next yackfest takes place in Mexico City in December 2010, the steam will have gone out of the “global warming” scare. We should not let our guard down, but Copenhagen is more than the end of the beginning for Green fascism: it is the beginning of the end. The eco-Nazis’ attempt at global bureaucratic coup d’etat has failed, and no such attempt is likely to succeed again. Too many of you are watching.
http://sppiblog.org/news/parturient-montes-nascetur-ridiculus-mus#more-314
Friday, December 18, 2009
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Monday, December 14, 2009
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
